Identify who agreed
Rule:
- Use circumstantial and direct evidence to create an account of why a particular D is part of an agreement
- The main way to avoid being part of a conspiracy is to stay quiet and call the cops
- Note that this may be hard in some industries where collusion is necessary to some degree
Caselaw:
U.S. v. Foley (1979) (boundary of conspiracy)
- Holding: evidence at trial was sufficient for jury to convict each D at trial
- Foley: clearly part of the agreement
- he mailed the increase announcement to all realtors, hosted the dinner, and pressured the other realtor to raise rates over the phone
- Carruthers: very likely part of the agreement:
- Most listings at 7%
- Called another realtor on three occasions to pressure him to raise rate with threats
- Called other realtors to complain about 6% listings
- Shannon & Luchs: might be part of the agreement
- Stated that they shouldn't discuss a rate increase at the dinner
- Stated that they would go to 7% at the beginning of the year, actually did
- Told another realtor they didn't need help
- Foley: clearly part of the agreement
- Facts: Foley hosts dinner for local realtors and announces that his firm is increasing its commission rate from 6% to 7%. Each D raises to 7% over the next months.
- Note: to avoid liability for agreement, Ds should have stayed quiet and informed the antitrust authorities
- Firms can be cautious to do this because collusion is necessary to some degree in some fields