Remedies
Remedies: mergers are largely an administrative process rather than judicial, reflected in remedies
Prohibition: court imposes a preliminary injunction, leading the parties to abandon the deal
- Negotiated settlement: After getting to second request, merging firms will start negotiating with the agency (settlement is the usual outcome)
- Designing a remedy:
Identify assets for divestiture
Determine the capability of a buyer
Timing of remedy (“fix it first”): depends on whether merging parties are repeat players – if they are, agencies will tell the firm to fix the merger and return after to negotiate
- Agents occasionally impose aggressive timelines: if fix isn’t implemented by some date, then the firm will have to sell off assets (like crown jewels)
“Litigating the fix”: if consent decree negotiations fail, both parties will try to position what happened to help them win the case
- D: we all agreed, so agency shouldn’t prevail in blocking the merger
- Agency: will reframe the issue
- Tunney Act review (DOJ settlements, not FTC): courts review settlements